Hilde · Decision models · answer key v2

Decision model

Elephant-1

1 question per request

52.4% of the 2,198 questions right (50.3% to 54.4%, 95% interval). Back to the leaderboard.

How we called it

Kind
Decision model
Access
Base Labs server (qev, the model card's loader), self-hosted, BF16
Paid as
Our own hardware
Model ID
baselabs/elephant-1
Parameters
9.4B
Hardware
1 × RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96 GB); BF16
Note
Base Labs' released elephant-1 weights (baselabs/elephant-1 at b3f8a93), a decision model post-trained from Qwen3.5-9B that also reads images. It ran on our hardware through its model card's loader (qev's DecisionEngine from OneJev at 81ce62f with the checkpoint's serve.patch, as the card's setup.sh installs it) behind our HTTP server (servers/baselabs_server.py), one request at a time. That runtime reads images only through an engine the patch leaves without the attention the model was trained with, so it is not on the Page images tab. The card mentions a trained "I don't know" option, but its answers have no such output, and our questions offer five options. Probabilities rounded to 6 decimals by the model's own loader. They sum to 1 only within that rounding, and the check before its runs allowed for it. Its card lists English only.
Confidence from
Option score
Run
373, 1 November 2026

Settings

Reasoning
off
Request format
1 question per request
Requests at once
1
Temperature
not recorded
Harness seed
0
Harness commit
12a2ea11acaf
Prompt version
254597b8be16

Results

QuestionsAccuracy95% intervalRight
All questions52.4%50.3% to 54.4%1,151 of 2,198
Reading80.5%77.3% to 83.3%528 of 656
Grammar40.4%38.0% to 42.9%623 of 1,542

Comparison group: C. Compare with another setup.

Accuracy by topic
TopicPartAccuracyRight
Word and phrase meaningsReading73.3%96 of 131
Sentence meaningsReading87.0%134 of 154
How a writer explains and develops ideasReading68.6%48 of 70
Topic and main point of a paragraphReading93.9%92 of 98
How a paragraph fits togetherReading70.8%75 of 106
Details that support a paragraph’s main pointReading85.6%83 of 97
Word types, such as nouns and verbsGrammar46.4%65 of 140
Groups of words built around a nounGrammar38.5%25 of 65
Verbs and their formsGrammar36.3%33 of 91
Verb forms used like nouns or modifiersGrammar38.9%28 of 72
Word endings and what they doGrammar43.0%34 of 79
How words are builtGrammar29.0%20 of 69
The roles of words and phrases in a sentenceGrammar39.3%57 of 145
How verbs show who acts and who receives the actionGrammar58.1%43 of 74
Types of sentencesGrammar31.8%27 of 85
Questions combining several grammar topicsGrammar29.5%65 of 220
Sound patterns and changesGrammar20.8%16 of 77
SpellingGrammar38.3%51 of 133
PunctuationGrammar47.0%55 of 117
Problems in sentence wordingGrammar59.4%104 of 175

Confidence

Answers kept at 99% or more
155, of which 0 wrong (share right: 97.6% to 100.0%, 95% interval); 2,043 skipped, the model less than 99% sure
Calibration gap
11.8 points
AUROC, all questions
0.79 0.77 to 0.81
AUROC, reading
0.86 0.83 to 0.89
AUROC, grammar
0.69 0.67 to 0.72
Brier score
0.200
Accuracy of its surest answers
most confident fifth: 95.2% right; most confident half: 72.9% right; most confident four fifths: 59.5% right
Typical score of a right answer
83.6%
Typical score of a wrong answer
47.0%

Repeats

Run 5 times on all questions.

Answers changed in 5 runs
0 of 2,198
Same wrong answer in all 5
1,047 of 2,198
Wrong in at least one run
1,047 of 2,198
Accuracy in each run
52.4%, 52.4%, 52.4%, 52.4%, 52.4%

Latency

Latency, median request
0.074 s (this run)
Latency, 90th percentile
0.089 s
Requests at once
1
Throughput
783.6 questions per minute of request time
Request time
2.8 minutes, over the requests whose answers were kept

Latency: the time from sending one request to receiving its answer, measured from our computer, network and any retries within the request included. Request time: the time at least one request was in flight, over the requests whose answers were kept. It is not the run's elapsed time: it leaves out requests that failed and any pause before a run was resumed.

Cost

$ per 1,000 questions
$0.014
Whole run
$0.030
Basis
Estimated at Baseten's list price for the same model; our hardware cost is not measured.
Price
$0.035 input, output free per 1M tokens (source, 2026-11-01)
Input tokens per question
396
Output tokens per question
1

Going first in front of an LLM

Replay of recorded answers, cutoff chosen on half the questions, averaged over the splits. Savings are estimates from API prices; the Method page explains how.

LLM behind itShare takenAccuracy changeSaving
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh reasoning · 16 questions per request10.0%−0.10 points9%§
GPT-6 Astrahigh reasoning · 16 questions per request10.0%−0.10 points10%§
GPT-6.1 Solhigh reasoning · 16 questions per request10.2%−0.12 points9%§
GPT-6 Astralow reasoning · 16 questions per request10.2%−0.12 points10%§
GPT-6 Astralow reasoning · 1 question per request10.2%−0.12 points10%§
Gemini 3.8 Flashlow reasoning · 1 question per request10.2%−0.12 points9%§
GPT-6.1 Sollow reasoning · 1 question per request11.1%−0.12 points11%§
GPT-6.1 Sollow reasoning · 16 questions per request10.2%−0.12 points9%§
Claude Opus 5.5high reasoning · 16 questions per request13.0%−0.15 points13%§
GPT-6.1 Terrahigh reasoning · 16 questions per request11.8%−0.11 points9%§
Claude Opus 5.5low reasoning · 1 question per request11.5%−0.08 points11%§
Gemini 3.8 Flashlow reasoning · 16 questions per request10.8%−0.16 points6%§
GPT-6.1 Terralow reasoning · 16 questions per request12.0%−0.12 points9%§
Claude Opus 5.5low reasoning · 16 questions per request15.1%−0.16 points15%§
Claude Sonnet 5.5high reasoning · 1 question per request14.6%−0.20 points14%§
Claude Sonnet 5.5high reasoning · 16 questions per request17.9%−0.17 points17%§

§ Counts the first model at its maker’s list price for the same model; our hardware cost is not measured.